Archive

Archive for September, 2009

The Washington Post Gets One Right

September 9th, 2009
Mark T. Warner No comments

I never thought I’d see the day when the Washington Post and I were on the same page.  But there it was—right there on my screen—an article posted online about transparent mortgages.

Okay, so I admit it—the article isn’t ACTUALLY about transparent mortgages, per se.   It’s about how to reduce the amount of closing costs that homebuyers have to pay.   But one of those suggestions?  To shop and negotiate all of a loan’s terms, not just the rate.

Finally!  Folks are starting to get it!  There is more to a mortgage loan than just an interest rate…a lot more.  And if there’s one thing that the past few years has taught us, it’s important to take a look at all of the details before making a decision as big as the one to buy a home.

Here’s an example that’s pretty close to home for me.   A friend of mine—we’ll call her Janice—was looking at buying her first home.   Now, in the interest of full disclosure, I have to tell you that Janice has worked in my office for about 10 years or so, so she was pretty familiar with the mortgage process.  But this time it was different, because it was her name on the mortgage.

Now, she was bound and determined to get absolutely the lowest rate she could possibly find.  Weeks went by as she considered loan option after loan option, debated whether to lock her rate or let it float—to tell you the truth, she was making us all a smidge nuts.  (Sorry Janice.)  But one day, when she was going through everything that she would have to bring to the closing table, she took a closer look at the rate sheet.   And what did she realize?  That by taking a rate that was just 0.5% of a point higher, she would receive a credit of almost $2,000 that she could use toward her closing costs.   That made a huge difference in her budget.  But the difference in her monthly payment?  $9 a month.

Now there are those folks who would start protesting and saying how when you multiply that $9 a month over the term of the loan, you’d pay thousands more than the credit you received.  Yeah.  So again in the interests of full disclosure, I should tell you that after Janice has paid on the loan for 217 months—almost 18 years—she will indeed be “upside down” on that $9 a month payment.  It is also likely that by then she’ll be making more money than she is now—at least more than $9 a month more—or that she will have long since sold the house.

Listen, the point is that everyone who is buying or refinancing a home needs to look at all of the loan terms—including asking to see the back-end (transparent) pricing that the loan officer sees—before making a decision that will impact their budgets now and in the future.   And yes, requiring lenders to be as competitive as possible in every aspect of the loan programs they’re promoting.

Congratulations, Washington Post.  You got this one very, very right.

Mortgages, Retirement and Dining on Drywall

September 7th, 2009
Mark T. Warner No comments

A lot of information has been in the news recently about folks buying and selling (or trying to sell) their homes.  Less focus has been paid, however, to why right now is a great time to refinance.  And the folks who should really be paying attention?  Those heading into retirement in the next decade or so.

In a report titled “Should You Carry a Mortgage Into Retirement”, Anthony Webb, a research economist at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College finds that retired households are better off repaying their mortgage, as they are unlikely to find a return on investments that make more than they’re paying in interest every year—even when taking tax deductions into account.

Having been in the financial services industry for over 30 years, I was actually surprised to learn in Webb’s report that as recently as 2007, 41% of folks in their 60’s had a mortgage—and more than half of them actually had money that they could use to pay off their house in entirety.   But I understand why.

You see, while everyone would love to head into “their golden years” with no debt and plenty of cash in the bank, most people have to take a realistic, balanced approach based on where they are now and what they’ll need in the future.  If your home is paid in full, but your cash reserves are limited or non-existent, retirement won’t be a piece of cake.  After all, as I like to say, you can’t eat sheetrock.  On the other hand, if your savings and investments are being drained because of monthly mortgage payments, that also limits the time and resources you have to enjoy a well-earned retirement.

That’s why for those who are thinking about retirement within the next 15 years or so—especially those who have lived in their home and have a positive equity position—now is a great time to refinance to a lower rate.  And, depending on how long you have until your retirement and your ability to build long-term wealth, it can also be an excellent time to reduce the term of your loan.  By doing so, more of each monthly payment goes towards paying down principal and getting you closer to being a homeowner in the truest sense of the word—without putting you at risk of being house-poor either in the short term or longer one.

So should you carry a mortgage into retirement?  Only you can answer that one.  But whether the answer is yes or no–just remember that now is still an excellent time to make the most of every dollar by reducing your interest rate or loan term.

Categories: Transparent Mortgage News Tags:

What?! Men and Women Differ? Shocking!

September 5th, 2009
Mark T. Warner No comments

My wife and I have been married for 32 years, brought 8 (no, that’s not a typo) kids into this world, and have had the opportunity to buy four homes in which to house them and us.   And there has never been a single time that we’ve agreed on what we are looking for when we buy them.

Sure, we knew about how many bathrooms we needed (there were never enough) and how many bedrooms would fit all of us.  We could even agree quite often about the size of the garage (again, never big enough).   But that’s about where it ended.  You see, for me, I dreamed of finding a house that I could move into, unpack, toss my feet up on the coffee table and stay awhile without having to replumb, rewire or repaint.  My wife, on the other hand, would still be carrying in boxes from the moving truck as she plotted exactly which shade of beige (during my marriage, I’ve learned that there are roughly 38,000) she would paint the kitchen.

The fact is, men and women are different.  And a recent Coldwell Banker survey learned a lot more about how.   Women would rather live closer to their extended family than their job, and they tend to know faster whether a house is right for them.  Men were more likely to need to see a house two times or more before making a decision, and were far more likely to want to turn an extra room into the proverbial “man cave”; i.e, an entertainment center.

What I thought was particularly interesting, however, was how many (70%) of those surveyed said that they make financial decisions together—something I found very heartening.   After all, things like buying a house are huge commitments for any couple, and both of them should have a say in the process.   And not just choosing the house itself, but also realistically discussing the kind of payment they can afford each month, what kind of financing they’re going to look for, the real estate agent they’re going to choose and the lender they’re going to work with.

And, most importantly, how soon the kitchen has to be painted.

Chickens, Foxes and Some Market Perspective

September 3rd, 2009
Mark T. Warner No comments

I have a friend who’s a little—okay—A LOT nervous about the economy.  But this is really nothing new; I think she’s been nervous about the economy for about the last 20 years.  Good times and bad, market ups and downs, she’s worried about what’s going to happen next.   In her world, the sky is always falling.

Now, I’ve been in the financial industry for longer than I care to mention—certainly longer than my youthful appearance would suggest.  And admittedly, I get concerned about an occasional market downturn.  But I don’t let it send me into a spiraling world of worry, despair, and ulcers.  Here’s why:

Our market is relatively young.  Do you realize that it took more than 50 years–until 1982—before the Dow Jones crossed the 1000 mark?  It was only then that the market began to really skyrocket, taking only 5 years to hit the 2000 mark, another 8 to hit the 4000 mark, and less than 4 more to hit the 10,000 mark.  In short, between 1982 and 1999, the stock market gained 9000 points!

Unfortunately, the people who are currently investing in—and reporting on—the market (including the mortgage market) seem to forget its history.  If you were to turn on the television or read an online market analysis, you’d almost believe that the Dow began functioning in 2003 (the last time the market was at today’s levels) and that the explosive growth that peaked in late 2007/early 2008 was normal.  That’s just simply not the case.

So I’m telling you what I tell my friend when she begins running and clucking:  Markets rise and markets fall.  Interest rates go up and down.  Property values change—not always for the better in the short-term.  But when you take a long-term perspective, both on investments and homeownership, growth is not only likely, it’s highly probable.    And I also tell her that Warren Buffet and the market foxes like him didn’t make money by buying high and selling low; they invested when the market is down and take advantage of future growth.

And here’s a little something else to remember—especially when it comes to buying a home in today’s market.  Just 15 years ago, people were clamoring to buy when interest rates on a 30-year fixed rate loan were at 8.00%.  10 years before that, 17% percent was a screaming deal.  Today’s rates start at 4.75% for that same 30 year loan, and loan professionals—at least, those with whom I work—are making mortgage loan information a whole lot more transparent and reducing loan fees and costs.  Now, combine those rates and that level of disclosure with home prices at a 5-year low…and things don’t look quite so bad, do they?

Chicken or fox?  You choose.  As for me…I’ve never much cared for feathers.

Here’s to things being bigger–and getting better–in Texas

September 1st, 2009
Mark T. Warner No comments

As a Texan, I’m used to pretty much everything being bigger here, from the size of our trucks to the smiles on our faces.  It was nevertheless disappointing to read in a report from RealtyTrac that Texas is now making some big news in a not-so-great way:  it’s in the top 10 states for foreclosure filings.   Foreclosures were up 6% in July from the month prior—and up 16% from the same period the previous year.

But according to Mark Dotzour, director and chief economist of the Real Estate Center at Texas A&M, not all is lost in the Lone Star State.  In fact, he believes that now is the time to buy or build a home here, with one significant caveat:  that “the federal government doesn’t cause further damage to the U.S. economy with higher levels of intervention in healthcare, taxation, cap and trade and rewriting accounting and legal standards.”

Now generally I’m a pretty optimistic guy with high hopes for the future.  In fact, I’m one of those folks who encourages people to turn off their televisions, ignore the doom and gloom and go out there and do some economic stimulating all on their own.  I’m a cheerleader for home ownership and believe that the recent downturn can end once the public starts investing in real estate—and their futures—once again.   And yes, I’m going to keep leading the charge for transparency in mortgage lending as a way of turning this industry around.

But I’ve got to tell you that Doutzour’s warning gave me pause.  You see, in the midst of raucous town hall meetings, the skyrocketing national debt, and the government being involved in private business a little too much for my comfort (regardless of which party is in office), I’m just not sure that “further damage” isn’t at least somewhat inevitable.

And this is one time that this Texan actually hopes that he’s wrong.