Obama’s Constant Campaigning Harpoons Possible Housing Recovery

You can’t teach an old dog new tricks and it seems you can’t teach a young American President anything new about economics either.   In spite of all the carnage created from government intervention in the U.S. housing market over the past decades and more recently during this current Democratic Administration, the government refuses to back off and let the market cure and heal itself.

Campaigning More Important Than Governing

Once again it seems for political purposes and to have empty political promises to try and appease the American voter, Mr. Obama has introduced another ‘help mechanism’ for certain homeowners.   To quote a newspaper article reporting on the Obama stunt, “The federal government’s revamped mortgage-refinancing program could allow more than a million borrowers to take advantage of falling interest rates, even if the value of their homes has plummeted.   While the plan, announced as expected on Monday, could provide a modest boost to spending and some relief to homeowners, economists said more action may be needed to stabilize the ailing housing market.

The overhaul of the Home Affordable Refinance Program, or HARP, will let borrowers whose mortgages are backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac refinance, regardless of how far their homes’ values have fallen, eliminating a previous limit.”

Government Spending Comes From Your Pocket

If this misguided effort continues, and the government intervention doesn’t subside, the housing market’s chances of recovering any time soon will be impossible.    What it seems Mr. Obama and his aides fail to understand is every time they get involved they are spending money right out of the pocket of every American citizen.   A new mortgage help program, a new student loan program, help for the poor, help for someone else, spending on anything else; it’s doesn’t matter, it all has to come on the backs of normal people.

Spending Other People’s Money

Obama and his people don’t understand that they are spending other people’s money.   Unfortunately, no one in government seems to understand that the money they spend doesn’t belong to them, and should be guarded and spent with more responsibility and humility than any of them possess.    The people send money to government, the government doesn’t grant money back to the people.

Let The Housing Market Cure Itself

If the housing market is to recover the normal influences of buying and selling, of supply and demand must be unleashed and allowed to work.    Sure, there will continue to be housing losses for individuals, but after the damage that’s been done by government intervention there is no way to avoid the consequences.    New plans to help struggling homeowners like this latest effort by Obama just delays the pain for the sake of having a campaign issue to preach to the voting public.

I’m tired of these government bureaucrats irresponsibly spending our money without consequences.   It would also be nice to get some leaders in government who care what happens to the American housing market enough to get out of the way and take their greasy, greedy hands out of our wallets.

The Government to the Rescue?

At first glance, homeowners facing refinancing troubles who have skimmed through the latest personal financing headlines are probably jumping out of their seats with glee.    The Federal Housing Finance Agency announced in an official news release on Monday that it plans to make adjustments to several refinancing policies, which could provide for tremendous help to those homeowners underwater.

Government Intervention Falls Short

In April 2009, the Department of the Treasury and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the agency which oversees Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, unveiled the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP).    It was a part of Obama’s Making Home Affordable program and is intended to assist borrowers ineligible for or struggling with refinancing overcome these hardships and refinance their mortgages under more stable circumstances or into lower interest rates.    HARP has, since its introduction, been the only available program that allows borrowers owing more than their homes’ values fortunate opportunities such as low interest rates.    Two years later and after helping approximately 894,000 borrowers and nine million families refinance, FHFA calls for a reinvention of the program after carefully reevaluating the program’s mechanics in early September.    The new project is known as “HARP Phase II”.

Enhancements In Program Attempt to Reach Everyone

Key changes, or “enhancements”, within the program include cutting out the current loan-to-value ceiling of 125 percent for fixed-rate mortgages, as well as eliminating or lowering select risk-based fees induced to those refinancing into shorter-term mortgages.    Because of the historical interest rates we are all aware of, the FHFA explained that these changes would better provide borrowers eligible for HARP with opportunities to take advantage of them.    Specifically, it’s expected to encourage more to refinance into shorter-term loans using the program, since it would likely reduce the balances owed by those underwater.    However, while all this reasoning sounds nice and some struggling borrowers may indeed improve their refinancing chances, it doesn’t appear that HARP has been enhanced to help all borrowers.    Let’s not forget that these agencies need to look out for their best interests, too, thus the program clearly isn’t a free-for-all.

“We know that there are many homeowners who are eligible to refinance under HARP and those are the borrowers that we want to reach,” said FHFA Acting Director Edward DeMarco in the agency’s news release.    “Our goal in pursuing these changes is to create refinancing opportunities for these borrowers, while reducing risk for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and bringing a measure of stability to housing markets,” he said.

Most Borrowers Who Want It, Won’t Receive It

The bigger catch is that the FHFA doesn’t even know approximately how many borrowers the enhancements will help.    Can we call HARP Phase II successful if it only helps about a million underwater homeowners?    Sources project that one million is the number of borrowers who will benefit from the revised program, or even less, which is a proportion dwarfed by the total number of borrowers who probably want or need HARP’s assistance.    Still, it’s much too early to tell what will come or who will benefit from HARP Phase II, but what’s likely is that most borrowers who want its service won’t receive it.

First-time Homebuyers: Put on your running shoes and get a tax credit and a transparent mortgage before time runs out!

Are you thinking of becoming a first-time homebuyer?   Then put on your running shoes and get moving!

Time is quickly ticking by for folks looking to enter the housing market before the $8,000 federal tax credit expires.  That deadline?  November 30, 2009.

Sure, you’re just winding down your summer vacations and getting the kids ready to head back for school.  It’s likely that the last thing on your mind is what will happen after Thanksgiving.  And that could be a mistake.

Why?  You see, because of recent changes in lending laws, mortgage companies are simply unable to close loans as quickly as they used to—even those who are committed to transparency in mortgage lending.    Underwriting that used to take a matter of days now takes weeks.  Appraisals are taking longer.  More homeowners are (wisely) getting home inspections done prior to the sale.  And some homeowners are buying properties under short-sale agreements, which only lengthens the process even more.  As such, it’s wise to count on about 6 weeks to 2 months to go from loan application to the closing table.

That means that RIGHT NOW is the time to be pre-qualifying for your loan and working with a real estate agent to find the right home.

If you’re not sure what the tax credit is, here is a great “fast facts” overview prepared by Chicago Tribune columnist Kathleen Lynn in an article earlier this month:

  • The tax credit is equal to 10 percent of the home’s purchase price, up to a maximum of $8,000.
  • Buyers can claim the credit on either their 2008 tax return or 2009 tax return. If the closing occurred after April 15, 2009, a buyer can claim the credit on a 2008 tax return by filing an amended return. For more information, go to www.irs.gov.
  • The home sale must close by November 30, 2009.
  • Full credit is available to buyers with modified adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 (single) or $150,000 (married).  A reduced credit amount is available for people with incomes of up to $95,000 (single) or $170,000 (married).
  • Two programs — one state, one federal — offer bridge loans or “prefunds” so eligible buyers can use cash from the credit on their home purchase this year. For more information, go to www.fha.gov.
  • Buyers do not need to repay the credit if they occupy the home for at least three years.

So if being in your new home for the holidays is on your wish list—and if you want to get the benefit of a fairly hefty tax credit—lace up your shoes, stretch our your hamstrings and begin the marathon that is buying your first home.

On your mark, get set….GO!

Fed proposes to increase transparency in mortgage lending…in 600 pages!

Does anyone else out there think it’s a little funny that the proposals recently approved by the Fed to increase transparency in mortgage lending ran more than 600 pages a piece?    It is for this reason—among a number of others—that I am more than a little concerned about the government’s rather forceful re-entrance of late (and yes, I know that the Fed isn’t “technically” part of the government) into the mortgage lending industry. lots of paperwork

I mean, how many pages does it take to say to mortgage lenders and brokers “disclose all of the details”?  How much legalese must be used in order to require “plain English” disclosures?  Only career politicians and those who aspire to be could take a simple, straight-forward idea and make it into such a convoluted mess.

And that’s why I believe that they should—for the most part—keep their hands out of it.

You see, in order for mortgage transparency to truly be effective, it has to come from the inside out.   Government programs, rules and regulations will always have loopholes.  They will always be the result of a compromise—and usually too watered down to be truly effective.  As our tax code easily illustrates, there is virtually always a way to cover up, get around or turn a blind eye to governmental rules.   It will only be when mortgage lenders decide to use open mortgage practices—either because they choose to do business in a more consumer-friendly manner or because homeowners refuse to do business with them if they do not—that true transparency will occur.

Hmm…seems like I got the point across in four paragraphs and I’m not sure how much clearer English could have been used.   Maybe some folks in Washington should get rid of 599 pages and just take one from me.

[Weekly Wrap-up] Exit Strategy, Gov’t Mortgage Program Lacks Luster, Would you buy a loan from a car salesman?

There is a lot of buzz in the mortgage and real estate market. Home sales are up and large corporations are talking about an end to the recession. There are some concerns, especially when the stock market is up 8.6% (over 1000 points) in the month of July, the largest gain in 20 years. Rapid increases in value can often be false security as more and more people jump onto this fast moving train. So this week we focus on concerns with the market and how to keep this train from derailing.

  1. Why Ben Bernanke’s Incomplete ‘Exit Strategy’ Could Lead To A Decade-Long Downturn

    Break up all the big banks and create a greater number of highly localized, community-centric banks. Let community and regional bankers securitize pools of mortgages using transparent “conforming” disciplines.

  2. Unemployment spreads distress in U.S. home loans

    Mortgages have failed the fastest in the areas with the greatest overbuilding, purchases by speculators and reliance on riskier loan products to improve affordability.

  3. Why Isn’t the Gov’t Mortgage Program Working?

    …servicers aren’t modifying loans because it doesn’t make business sense to do so. The Post highlights a study by Federal Reserve economists making that argument. Meanwhile, a Bank of America spokesperson told the Journal that many people seem to think they’re eligible for aid when they’re not: “Given widespread public mis-expectations, a significant percentage of borrowers seeking Home Affordable modifications under the imminent-default provisions will not qualify.”

  4. Would you buy a mortgage from a car salesman?

    He then said I was foolish for continuing to pay my mortgage at my current rate. I’d be better off not making my monthly payments, then demanding a change in terms, he said.

How to de-rail the government’s transparent mortgage reform train

Over the weekend I read another article about the steps the government is taking to reform mortgage services. I just shook my head thinking about all the tax dollars that are being spent on committees and research. You know how fast government works, right? Halfway through the article, it states that they are still years away from any type of reform. In my opinion, not only is the government again messing with the free economy, but they are taking power and the voice away from the consumer. When I say voice, I mean that most consumers think the government will make everything better and they should not demand transparent mortgage services NOW.

So I say, let’s derail this slow moving, tax funded, train!

…along with all of the reforms, really — could possibly cost consumers more for their mortgage, perhaps adding as much as a half a percentage point to their mortgage rates, said Cameron Findlay, chief economist for LendingTree.com. In addition, lenders who can’t afford to make the procedural changes might be forced out of business, which could effectively decrease competition, he added…

But, Findlay said, any extra costs would be worth it to restore faith in the system and protection for consumers. Also, it’s a drop in the bucket compared with what it’s costing to clean up the havoc created in the mortgage market and the entire economy when mortgage money was easy to get.
Source: MarketWatch

I say we can, and are, doing it now, for free and still maintaining the free economy.

Below are three points from the article that can be address now

  1. Requiring transparency. Consumers would receive a simple, integrated federal mortgage disclosure that is “reasonable, clearly written and concise,” and be adequately presented with the risks and benefits of a mortgage product.

    thumbs_upFirst of all, we have this now, it’s called the good faith estimate. It sounds like they want to add more documents to it, that probably won’t be read by the consumer because they will be given in the already large folder-o-docs that you get with any mortgage. You can make it as simple to read as possible, but when accompanied by dozens of other documents it just become another “skim over” item.Doesn’t better, more trustworthy, business win… Instead of waiting for the government to give the people the “thumbs up” and say it is now safe to borrow and trust mortgage brokers again, the consumer should be educated and shown that there are transparent mortgage services out there. Consumer demand outweighs government intervention any day!
  2. Promoting simplicity. Borrowers would first be offered “plain vanilla” mortgages with terms that are straightforward. They can obtain more complex mortgages, but those vanilla loans will be presented as a first choice.

    I think what they are talking about here is when a consumer cannot afford a mortgage of any type, so the mortgage broker gets creative, skips the 30 year fixed products and goes right to the adjustable mortgages. Again, it comes down to transparency of mortgage broker, and many Realtors, that often separate themselves from the mortgage side of things, need to stand up and protect their clients too. Real estate transparency is an umbrella, covering all aspects of the transaction.

  3. Demanding fairness. Mortgage brokers would be required to determine whether the mortgage they’re selling to a borrower is affordable, and prepayment penalties would be banned or restricted. Hidden fees that compensate a broker for selling a higher cost loan would be banned.

    This is where it starts to play with our free economy. Is that gas you’re buying affordable? Is that dentist bill affordable? is your paycheck big enough… This is a slippery slope when the government starts making vendors question whether the product they sell is affordable. Maybe the government should just jump in like health care and create a government mortgage loan service and compete with the big mortgage companies? That would solve everything!

If you think that we can change the mortgage industry before the government can, please become a fan of the Transparent Mortgage Network on Facebook. Let’s build a voice and create a better mortgage system.