Does anyone else out there think it’s a little funny that the proposals recently approved by the Fed to increase transparency in mortgage lending ran more than 600 pages a piece? It is for this reason—among a number of others—that I am more than a little concerned about the government’s rather forceful re-entrance of late (and yes, I know that the Fed isn’t “technically” part of the government) into the mortgage lending industry. 
I mean, how many pages does it take to say to mortgage lenders and brokers “disclose all of the details”? How much legalese must be used in order to require “plain English” disclosures? Only career politicians and those who aspire to be could take a simple, straight-forward idea and make it into such a convoluted mess.
And that’s why I believe that they should—for the most part—keep their hands out of it.
You see, in order for mortgage transparency to truly be effective, it has to come from the inside out. Government programs, rules and regulations will always have loopholes. They will always be the result of a compromise—and usually too watered down to be truly effective. As our tax code easily illustrates, there is virtually always a way to cover up, get around or turn a blind eye to governmental rules. It will only be when mortgage lenders decide to use open mortgage practices—either because they choose to do business in a more consumer-friendly manner or because homeowners refuse to do business with them if they do not—that true transparency will occur.
Hmm…seems like I got the point across in four paragraphs and I’m not sure how much clearer English could have been used. Maybe some folks in Washington should get rid of 599 pages and just take one from me.
We have started a fan page for the transparent mortgage movement. Instead of waiting for Washington to reform our system in a few years (if ever), let’s inform the consumer that there are transparent services out there NOW. It’s
Recent Comments